<table style="border: 1px solid #ffaa00; border-left: 10px solid #ffaa00; margin: 2px 10% 0px; background-color: #ffdd5e; vertical-align: middle;"><tr><td style="padding: 0.25em 0.5em; width: 100%;"> <center> <span style="color: blue;"> IMPORTANT: The <i>neutrality</i> of this article is currently disputed. Please do not remove this message until <i>neutrality</i> is met!</span> </center>
</td></tr></table>
<div class="quote"><i>Christina Pill wrote: It was, as in only Ho Chie Mihn and Mou Tsung-san had a military IQ factor or combat success gland. :-( .</i></div>
<p>I agree.
</p>
<p>Is Althisory's <i>1983: Doomsday </i>a bad time line? Some say it is overly optimistic, overly pessimistic, ultra cynical, ASB, war wacky or just a pile of ill-conceived tripe. I have heard it all and say it is war wacky, but what do you think?
</p>
<table style="border: 1px solid #ffaa00; border-left: 10px solid #ffaa00; margin: 2px 10% 0px; background-color: #ffdd5e; vertical-align: middle;"><tr><td style="padding: 0.25em 0.5em; width: 100%;"> <center> <span style="color: blue;"> IMPORTANT: The <i>neutrality</i> of this article is currently disputed. Please do not remove this message until <i>neutrality</i> is met!</span> </center>
</td></tr></table>
<p>Exactly my point! The alternate history stories that so many do are promoting it, necrophilia gloating over the deaths or portraying a non-event!
</p>
<p>Would every one agree that- 1983: Doomsday is atomo-fantasy and 1962: The Apocalypse became ASB (very over overoptimistic) and this genera is only about to please doom merchants, CND's more cynical parts, necrophiliacs and war-wackys.
</p>